As recently highlighted by Sharon Nelson on her excellent blog Ride the Lightening one of the things Craig Ball most enjoys is coming up with a challenging e-discovery hypothetical and then confounding some of his fellow luminaries in the EDD world. For Sharon’s full post click here.
The Edna challenge involves an old school chum who runs a small law firm. She wants to conduct an in-house review of ESI in a fairly small case. Craig outlines the facts, the technology available and the budget and then asks “How Should Edna proceed?” Sharon’s post has a link to the challenge.
Craig addresses a key point in the e-discovery world. As he says “a hurdle [for most] is the unavailability and high cost of specialized software to process and review electronic evidence”. What Craig does through his article/challenge is explore affordable, off-the-shelf ways to get where you need to go in e-discovery. As Craig says, few cases involve millions of files. Most entail review of material collected from a handful of custodians in familiar productivity formats like Outlook e-mail, Word documents, Excel spreadsheets and PowerPoint presentations.
Craig concluding point: vendors have not yet built a proper tool for those who need to perform “do it yourself” ESI review. Why are they ignoring 85% of the market?
It’s a great piece and (as always) from a Craig Ball article you learn a lot about e-discovery.